I picture this as one large group health plan where people pay an affordable rate (lower than we do now if we have employer provided health care) and you go to the doctor and your benefits cover this. With the regulation of doctors wages, test costs etc. how would this be a money losing deal unless a large group of people would be paying nothing or very little, and why would they have to raise taxes/revenue to “pay for this”? I have been trying to research this but really cant find out how this type of plan would work.
-
Recent Posts
- A glass of water – the best power engineering
- Somebody Finally Said It! stop obsessing over your BMI
- OMG It’s working!
- Benefits of Coconut Oil
- Brain Exercises Pay off
- The Health Danger of Trans Fats
- The HCG Diet
- Your Lowest Cost Health Insurance Options Today
- Healthy Christmas Recipes
- Low Cholesterol Foods
Insurance has traditionally been for the purpose of affording protection against something that is unlikely, like having a disastrous vehicle accident, having one’s house burn down, dying prematurely, etc. Which is why it’s affordable.
Healthcare insurance, on the other hand, affords protection against something that is INEVITABLE: needing a doctor. Healthcare insurance complicates a straightforward transaction, making it unwieldy and expensive.
Plus: who do you suppose w have so many foreign-born doctors in the US? You may arrive at an answer to this question. When you do, ask yourself: will this still be true if there is government healthcare insurance? What do you think will happen to the availability of doctors then?
The bases for healthcare reform is to lower the cost and provide qaulity healthcare to all Americans .76% of Americans in this country agree that the healthcare reform bill should have The Public Choice plan in it.